Monday, December 31, 2012
Saturday, December 29, 2012
French Rubbers - Michelin Pro3 Race And Hutchinson Atom Comp Clinchers
Nothing is a shot in the dark like the evaluation of
tires. Unless the tests are conducted
under controlled conditions, it is almost impossible to arrive at a uniform
conclusion due to all of the variables involved in real-world usage. While manufacturers put forth press releases
explaining the desirable attributes of their tires, in reality, to the average
cyclist, mileage will vary greatly from rider to rider. Thus, “Seat of the pants” tests are all we consumers
have to go on. That being the case,
there is still some concrete data which can be gleaned from the daily ride on
these round, rubber things we call tires.
Michelin Pro3 Race
Fresh out of the box.
I have used products across the Michelin realm, from
automobile tires, to commercial aircraft tires, to their line of excellent,
high performance motorcycle tires. I
figured if Michelin knew as much as they do about car, aircraft and motorcycle
tires, well, they just may know a thing or two about bicycle tires. Turns out they do.
The Pro3 Race is a traditional “Folding” tire, with a dual
compound, slick tread pattern – They were built for speed. They have a 110 TPI casing and weigh
approximately 200 grams. They mount up
easily with minimal work of the tire iron or some really strong fingers will do
the trick, as well. To date, I have
1800 miles on a pair of 700X23’s, which according to on-line reviews of these
tires is pretty darn good - For a racing tire.
However, it was not all without issues.
Small, nagging issues, thank goodness.
I ran them with Bontrager tubes from a low of 90 PSI to a
high of 120 PSI on SRAM S40 wheels to evaluate how they performed at various
pressures. Turns out they really like
the lower pressures, running extremely fast at 90 to 100 PSI. The Michelin’s saw duty from bike trails, to
steep climbs, to hairball, hard cornering, descents (including the Ojai
Century), and the rubber performed flawlessly in all weather conditions,
including light rain.
Smooth rolling, and not too bad looking, either.
The only issues I have seen with these tires are they nick
really, really easily. In my subjective
testing, the Pro3’s seemed to puncture rather easily compared to the Hutchinson’s. I have even read reports of Michelins getting
nicks and cuts in them after only one ride.
I find this to be true, however, it does not take away from the tires’
overall performance. And, for the
record, Michelin claims a 2500 mile service life. Well, maybe in a laboratory test they do, but
not out in the Real World. Mine are due
for replacement, and they will not live to see 1900 miles.
Now replaced in the Michelin line by the Pro4 Race’s, the Pro3’s
are still a tire to be reckoned with, and they can be had for as little as
$30.00 USD each.
Hutchinson Atom Comp
Sex and the single compound
I have to admit I tried the Hutchinson Atom Comp’s purely out of curiosity. First, they were available with red sidewalls, which was a giant plus to me. Also, since Lance Armstrong used Hutchinson’s almost exclusively throughout his career, I figured I would see what all of the hype was about.
I have to admit I tried the Hutchinson Atom Comp’s purely out of curiosity. First, they were available with red sidewalls, which was a giant plus to me. Also, since Lance Armstrong used Hutchinson’s almost exclusively throughout his career, I figured I would see what all of the hype was about.
I used the 700X23’s with Bontrager tubes on Mavic Ksyrium
SL’s for the duration I rode on these tires.
Smooth rolling, sticky in hardcore corning, and relatively durable,
overall, they can be had for as low as $35.00 USD.
While the Atom’s seemed like they were going to be quite an exceptionally durable tire, for reasons still inexplicable, the tread began to separate and crack, especially where the different colors of rubber met at approximately the 800 mile mark. I am not sure why this was, and I am certain this is not the status quo with this tires, as I have not heard of this happening to anyone else. I returned the tires to my dealer for evaluation by Hutchinson, but they dropped the ball (my dealer), and threw the tires out instead of reporting the issue. Rather than beat them over the head for lousy customer service (which I should have), they stepped up with a killer deal on the Michelin’s, and I have not looked back since due to the Pro 3’s awesome performance. Would I go back to the Atom Comp’s in the future? Yes, definitely.
Vive la France!
You cannot go wrong with either of these tires. Both are excellent racing, training, and street
tires that will provide all the performance you need without resorting to glue,
and without bursting your wallet.
However, while there are plenty more tires out there which will get you
higher mileage, and possess better puncture resistance (but do not roll as
smoothly), does this mean the Pro3’s or the Atom Comps are bad tires?
On the contrary, actually.
If you want the best performance bang for the buck, these tires are
excellent choices for riders of all levels of ability.
Fin
Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Monday, December 24, 2012
A Very Merry Christmas Courtesy Of Boeing Commercial Airplane Group.
Some of you loyal readers may not be aware, but in addition
to all things cycling, I have also a spent a significant portion of my life in
the aviation business, as well. Thus, it is indeed a rare occasion when
one can come across cool corporate cycling jerseys. Even rarer still are aviation cycling
jerseys. That being the case, when my
contact at Boeing offered up these two beauties, well, how could I refuse? I mean, c’mon, it is the 787 Dreamliner, and
the new 737 MAX, for cryin’ out loud!
With the 787 just entering service, and the 737 MAX is still on the
drawing board, to not only to see, but to receive these jerseys, was indeed a
Christmas treat.
Front of the jerseys
With the Holiday Season in full-swing I admit to not riding
as much as I would have liked, which kinda’ bugs me. However, Christmas is a time of year quite a
bit busier than others, so I am sure this a common theme among many a rider
right now. I mean, there are parties to
go to, food and drinks galore, plus short daylight hours, so squeezing in a
ride can be a little more difficult than usual.
Well, new jerseys
makes the incentive to get on out and ride that much greater.
The rear of the jerseys
The rear of the jerseys
On the path leading up to Christmas and the New Year, I have
indeed been blessed with good friends and now some killer riding apparel, too.
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Saturday, December 15, 2012
Running Opposite Traffic – What’s Up With That?
Just another example of rude behavior. Just who's safety is being violated here?
When I was a kid we were taught to always walk and ride our
bicycles with the flow of traffic. Later
in life I was a runner for over twenty years, and I never ran against traffic
on streets, sidewalks, or on any bikeways.
I was never rude, arrogant, aggressive, nor did I expect other people to
get out of MY way. Things have changed. And, it seems a new, dangerous, selfish way
of thinking is afoot.
Lately, I have had to do a lot of swerving out of the far
right side of traffic lanes, and even out of marked bike lanes, to miss
oncoming runners, all whom refused to move over and allow safe passage. I have even seen a growing number of cyclists
and walkers doing the same thing. They
are even pulling this crap on bicycle trails along riverbeds, too. And, in all cases, there was plenty of
sidewalk and pathways for pedestrians to utilize without impeding the flow of
traffic.
What the heck is this behavior all about? Did a
new law pass few got the memo about? Did
the magnetic poles reverse? Do British
rules of the road now apply here in America?
Being I like to get to the bottom of new phenomena, I asked some
people I know, all whom are voracious runners, why they insist on training against
the flow of traffic. They all claimed it
was “In the name of safety.”
Oh, really? Let’s
investigate that claim.
The Myth: Running/Cycling/Walking
against the flow of traffic allows a clear view of on-coming traffic. It makes travel safer.
The Fact:
Running/Cycling/Walking opposite traffic is inherently more dangerous to yourself
and to others. Here’s why:
First, closure speeds will now be higher, meaning less
reaction time on both parties’ behalf. Second,
if a cyclist must swerve wide to avoid Wrong-Way Dufus, and we often do, the
cyclist is placed at risk in two ways - Having to swerve left to miss the
opposite direction moron, the rider is forced into traffic and incurs the major
risk of being hit from behind by a motor vehicle. And, if the cyclist swerves right to avoid same
moron, then the curb, road signs and trees are right there to greet the rider. And finally, traffic traveling in the correct
direction is not expecting someone to be coming directly at them, not to
mention traffic making turns being surprised by a “Wrong Way” buffoon.
Researching marathon and triathlon sites on the net reveals
this wrong-way behavior is actually encouraged to avoid “Being hit by vehicles
from behind.” While this may sound like intelligent,
good advice, did any of these idiots stop to think that if you don’t run in the
street in the first place you don’t have to worry about being hit from behind by
vehicles? Yeah, I’m betting none of these
weekend warriors ever stopped to ponder that fact at all.
If you analyze the law here in California, it basically states the
following regarding pedestrians (i.e. Runners): Unless for the purpose of crossing a street/road/highway in a legal,
safe manner (or in an emergency), a pedestrian may not enter the road, or block
vehicular traffic, including bicycles, for any reason. I did not recite the Californian Vehicle Code
verbatim, however, that seems pretty cut and dry. If you don’t believe me, contact the
California Highway Patrol (or your State Trooper) for verification of what I
just described.
So, the bottom line regarding opposite traffic idiots – Why
are you behaving so selfishly dangerous?
Please knock off your aggressive, reckless behavior. It is hard enough having to deal with
vehicular traffic, but must we have to deal with you violating our safety and
right of way, as well?
What did the rest of us do to you to deserve such treatment?
Thursday, December 13, 2012
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Our Doper Is Cooler Than Your Doper!
To paraphrase singer
Lesley Gore, “It’s my blog, and I’ll bag on people if I want to.”
It is pretty much universally agreed there are five traditional
human senses: Sight, hearing, taste, smell and touch. Unfortunately, it looks like we can add a new
one - Hypocrisy. Well, maybe that is being a bit dramatic in the literary sense, so let me just put forth it must be part of the Human Condition.
It does not take a PhD in Literature to smell which way a particular
media outlet leans editorially these days. To put it even simpler terms – It
does not take much effort to sniff out partisan hacks, anymore. Harsh words you may think? Well, not so fast. Allow me to expound on the morass which
passes for Cycling and Media these days.
So, just what has brought forth from my psyche the following
tale of bizarre behavior? Well, I just
got finished with the January 2013 issue of Velo Magazine, and the bullshit has
become so thick over there you couldn’t cut it even with a brand new,
extra-sharp 53-chain ring. Cancel my subscription, please!
And for the record, this article is not a hit piece on Velo
Magazine. They don’t need me for that,
anyway. The madness runs deep and wide
across the entire cycling media spectrum, and there is indeed an answer to the odd,
macabre mystery of what cycling currently is and where it may be headed.
For openers, the so-called “Anti-Doping” crowd has finally
found something they hate worse than doping itself - Lance Armstrong. The battle lines have been drawn between the
Armstrong supporters and his detractors, I mean, enemies. The drama, and the humor within, is observing
the “Anti-Doping” crowd fully embrace, dare I say it, A DOPER, to support their own case for the elimination of performance
enhancing drugs. I am not making this
stuff up, folks! See, they hate doping
(so they claim), but, they just didn’t like THAT doper. THEIR doper is OK, though.
And just who is THEIR
doper? Well, Tyler Hamilton, of course. The (now formally) disgraced, hated, ignored racer,
who just recently, could not even catch a break from his own shadow, is now the
poster boy for “Clean” cycling. Wow, now
that was a switch!
Ponder the following, Grasshopper. How is it possible Tyler Hamilton (the new “King
of Truth,” and busted, admitted doping cheat) went from the proverbial Pit to
the Palace without so much as smelling like the very manure he shovels? Well, the “Cycling Community” won’t tell you
how, and this includes Velo Magazine, and pretty much all of the cycling media. See, when a person could not even get someone
to piss on their gums, even if their teeth were on fire, how is it they are now
the anointed “King of Truth” when it comes to justice regarding doping and
cycling?
It is quite simple, really.
To first have a scapegoat, you must first have a hero.
For the “Anti-Doping” faction there are only two sides in
this argument, and for them it is clear-cut - Armstrong versus Hamilton. However, in reality, there are three sides in
this power struggle for cycling’s future (and yes, it is a power struggle). They are Armstrong, versus Hamilton, versus all the rest of us who don’t
really give a shit, because we knew the game was rigged in the first
place. Therefore, all of the cries for
reform are nothing but smoke and mirrors at best.
What we are witnessing is like that old Who song which wisely
proclaimed: “Meet the new boss. Same as
the old boss.” We are simply viewing a
changing of the guard, not a grass-roots, benevolent movement for the greater
good of cycling. It is nothing but a
power grab by the New Boss seeking to oust the Old Boss, and that “Greater
Good” will be defined as is seen fit for all to live under once the New Boss is
in power.
All of this nonsense is out there for anybody with a
molecule of reasoning to comprehend, if you try. You just have to dig a little. Peruse any media source regarding bicycle
racing, Lance Armstrong, or Tyler Hamilton, and the scenario just lays itself
bare for public viewing. And, it does
not stop with Lance or Tyler - People, and their reputations are falling all
around us, and the death toll will be high in this conflict.
Additionally, consider this scenario. Following the illogical rants of the “Guilty
because I said-so,” sanctimonious, anti-doping police, how long will it be
before we discover Bradley Wiggins, Mark Cavendish and Marianne Vos are found
to be juiced to the Moon? Really, this
is not a stretch of the imagination or innuendo for that matter. Remember, the burden of proof to this point
has been if you are an icon of the sport, you got there by doping. And, the “King of Truth” has pointed out doping
was present and deeply systemic in the sport.
How else do you explain a multi-time winner/champion, or so the
anti-doping police crowd claims? However,
as for the currently agreed upon innocence of the above mentioned riders, well,
doping was only a constant of the Armstrong culture we are told, and there is absolutely
no way Dopers are dominating the sport today.
Oh, really? Well, time will bare
this one out, I am sure.
In summation, I must state the obvious again, being it seems
to be forgotten so often by our species – Anywhere there is money, fame,
prestige and eventually power to wielded, you will find the cheaters, the
liars, the thieves, the cut-throats, the desperate and the clinically
narcissistic. Call it cause and effect,
as this description would be completely apropos. To put it even more succinctly – One has to
have had their head fully implanted up their anus to NOT know performance enhancing drugs drove the sport.
In humanity, there never has, nor will there ever be, a
completely level playing field. It is
just a fact of human nature that rules will always be broken by the
unscrupulous seeking a quick way to the top.
So, as I had mentioned previously, Hypocrisy must be part of the Human Condition.
And if it isn’t, it ought to at least be one of the Original
Sins.
Monday, December 10, 2012
Quick Peek. SRAM Red One-Piece Cassettes - Call 'Em Industrial Art.
Photo Courtesy SRAM
Machined from solid pieces of billet, these cassettes are not only beautiful to watch being made and admire before installing on your bike, but they are also awesome to use.
So, whether you are a fan of SRAM or not, you have to appreciate how Red OG-1090 cassettes get made.
Machined from solid pieces of billet, these cassettes are not only beautiful to watch being made and admire before installing on your bike, but they are also awesome to use.
So, whether you are a fan of SRAM or not, you have to appreciate how Red OG-1090 cassettes get made.
Saturday, December 8, 2012
Death Of The Turn Signal.
In the beginning, right after the Earth cooled, oil discovered,
and the automobile conceived, there thankfully appeared a brilliant safety
device once known as the Turn Signal Indicator.
It was a simple, elegant invention, and it made the difference between
safe passage and catastrophe. Now,
sadly, it seems to be gone.
While bike trails are a separate adventure unto themselves (and
a tale for another day), most of our daily riding is conducted on roads we have
to share with dangerous, deadly creatures known as Drivers. And, as I am sure all of us have experienced
(in some case painfully), not all drivers possess the basic equipment necessary
to operate a motor vehicle. And, I just
don’t mean a license and insurance, I mean a brain.
To anyone whom has ridden a bicycle, or driven a vehicle, the
concept of announcing ones’ intentions to other motorists/cyclists, even
pedestrians, has pretty much been abandoned.
Call it laziness, or just a lack of concern for others, or probably
both, this simple courtesy should not have died so suddenly and quietly.
So, while some people long for a lost love, or simply the nostalgia
of the past, I long for the return of common sense, and within this realm, the
reemergence of the turn signal.
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Prototype SRAM Hydraulic Disc Brakes Spotted.
Disc Brakes Are A Comin,' Folks.
Photos courtesy Wil Matthews/Velo Magazine
Seen and photographed at CXLA 2012.
Photos courtesy Wil Matthews/Velo Magazine
Seen and photographed at CXLA 2012.
Monday, December 3, 2012
Wait, What's This? Now The Brits Are Blowing The Cheating Whistle Again - This Time In Motorcycle Racing?
Cheating In World-Class Sports? Tell Us Something We Don't Know.
Editor's Note: Cheating is, unfortunately, part of the human condition. As I have written in previous articles regarding, anytime an advantage to get ahead of other people exists, some unscrupulous people will take it. Be it for grades in school, a spot on the team, admission to college, lying on a resume, faking your work on the job, or running for public office, cheating is everywhere. The real question should be not if it exists, but how long are we as the human race going to tolerate it.
Well, since the Brits seem to be at the leading edge of cleaning up bicycling at the moment, I though this tidbit from the motorcycling spectrum just might tie-in.
The following story is from SuperbikePlanet.com
Smith Blows Whistle On Moto2 Cheating
by staff
Friday, November 30, 2012
What's this? Allegations of cheating in spec racing? So now Moto2 hasn't made entry-class racing in MotoGP cheaper at all and well-funded teams can use equipment other teams can't?
The embers of controversy were cooling surrounding allegations late this season that Marc Marquez's team altered the software on his Suter-Honda Moto2 bike, providing him a significant advantage in acceleration out of corners all year en route to winning the 2012 Moto2 World Championship.
But those coals are sparked again after fellow Moto2 graduate and 2013 MotoGP rookie Bradley Smith dumped kerosene on Marquez and other Moto2 teams that he alleges were cheating throughout the 2012 season.
Smith was signed to a MotoGP contract with Tech 3 before the 2012 season and appeared to be a curious choice for promotion after he managed only a ninth-place finish in the Moto2 standings this season for Tech 3, with no podium finishes.
But Smith said chicanery by many other teams masked his true pace. And, for the record, this is a British rider making these accusations now.
"To be honest, a lot of it came down to ... there was cheating going on inside Moto2 this year," Smith told British media. "We were not one of those teams, and we suffered for it. There was nothing else we could do as a team to make our bike faster. It was just slow.
Editor's Note: Cheating is, unfortunately, part of the human condition. As I have written in previous articles regarding, anytime an advantage to get ahead of other people exists, some unscrupulous people will take it. Be it for grades in school, a spot on the team, admission to college, lying on a resume, faking your work on the job, or running for public office, cheating is everywhere. The real question should be not if it exists, but how long are we as the human race going to tolerate it.
Well, since the Brits seem to be at the leading edge of cleaning up bicycling at the moment, I though this tidbit from the motorcycling spectrum just might tie-in.
The following story is from SuperbikePlanet.com
Smith Blows Whistle On Moto2 Cheating
by staff
Friday, November 30, 2012
What's this? Allegations of cheating in spec racing? So now Moto2 hasn't made entry-class racing in MotoGP cheaper at all and well-funded teams can use equipment other teams can't?
The embers of controversy were cooling surrounding allegations late this season that Marc Marquez's team altered the software on his Suter-Honda Moto2 bike, providing him a significant advantage in acceleration out of corners all year en route to winning the 2012 Moto2 World Championship.
But those coals are sparked again after fellow Moto2 graduate and 2013 MotoGP rookie Bradley Smith dumped kerosene on Marquez and other Moto2 teams that he alleges were cheating throughout the 2012 season.
Smith was signed to a MotoGP contract with Tech 3 before the 2012 season and appeared to be a curious choice for promotion after he managed only a ninth-place finish in the Moto2 standings this season for Tech 3, with no podium finishes.
But Smith said chicanery by many other teams masked his true pace. And, for the record, this is a British rider making these accusations now.
"To be honest, a lot of it came down to ... there was cheating going on inside Moto2 this year," Smith told British media. "We were not one of those teams, and we suffered for it. There was nothing else we could do as a team to make our bike faster. It was just slow.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)